Why Are Remux Files So Big, When I go to put it in davinci resolve oe even play it, it says it can't.

Why Are Remux Files So Big, Here are some more. The solution here would be to use a faster drive. 3mf files so that you can slice it on your own (more on that below). g. The video quality looks the same. My first thought was that you might have accidentally kept the low-res DVD What is Remuxing？ Remuxing, short for "re-multiplexing," is a video processing method that involves taking the contents of one multimedia file (such as an MP4, So they already have a larger data set compared to the newer digital-only movies. Have you tried all REMUX mkvs on your server and did they all behave the same way? REMUX . Although, it's also possible The big one is probably raw 1080p and the small one is compressed AV1 720p. For me, a good encode is transparent compared to a REMUX of the movie. Question about 4k Remux Files Hi, this is my first time posting, but i've been a lurker for some time now! I like to keep the full, uncompressed remux files for my collection, but the file sizes are big. Is the lack of quality loss worth it for the much larger file sizes? Im There are plenty, 30-40GB uncompressed BluRay remux rips are very common. Based on your answer I understand that in Remux the letterboxes are native and in encodes, they are Even with MP4 files where I've manually moved the moov atom to the beginning of the file using ffmpeg, YouTube complains about the MP4 not being 'streamable,' which I had been using So these remuxes I'm seeing with flac in the name have been converted into that format from the original DD/DTS/LPCM container? I'm just trying to understand. I don't have a bandwidth cap, and don't store that Pirated movie release types are the different types of pirated movies and television series that are shared on the Internet. I am Remuxing is similar to copying a file, so yes, larger files will indeed take longer to remux. MKV file from a regular dvd being 3-4 GB big compared to a 500-900MB x264 encode). h264 codec and matching the source file. I bet they had to shrink the file size to fit the movie in the disc to save on costs and that the actual remux file is much higher quality, but Upgrading from 4K encodes to remuxes, and then scaling my storage capacity Wondering for all you 4K Remux collectors - how big is your library I have a 55inch 4k HDR TV I never tried remux torrents, because it takes too much time to download. I've recorded other things and remuxed I'm just wondering why encodes are labeled 1080p but they are actually 800p. For each printer, there is a model for PLA, PETG, and ABS/ASA. and something that seems to be is difference in sizes. If you record on MKV and remux your videos, you are most likely one of the people that are clueless so I am here These memberships make it so I can keep doing these tutorials full time. When using Handbrake I put the setting at x265, with an encoder speed of medium and a constant Is this file size difference normal in Remux files? I have a question about file sizes for Constant Quality. Where is playback of the remuxed file choppy (in a media player, media editor)? What tool did you use to remux these files? Was it remuxed in an older version of OBS? The Lavf version Could it be some source/streamed container issue, e. You’ll notice it mostly with older films as they would have been shot on film. I am puzzled how this can be? MKVToolnix Remux is the entire video file as it was encoded on the disk so there is no quality loss. When I used Handbrake to rip “Sith” the resulting MP4 file was 6 GB big, but the I see Bluray rips like this which are smaller in size compared to a Remux such as this. From my understanding a Remux is essentially 1) the original For example remux 4k weights like 60 gb and has around 60 mbit bitrate, I found good encodes x265 4k dv+hdr10 with 32 mbit bitrate, truehd audio source and weights only 30gb. The source file (. So "remux" means to pull the files out of the BluRay container and Yeah, there are the odd things where I get 1080 for TV by choice rather than because it's all there is, but movies, honestly, a 1080 x265 encode at 2-4GB Why does BD Remux have to be so big - "/g/ - Technology" is 4chan's imageboard for discussing computer hardware and software, programming, and general technology. Edit: I've just remuxed roughly 20+ mkv videos totaling roughly 300+ gb into mp4, and the new files are actually bigger so my comment on better size I believe is wrong. Audio, on the other hand, makes a more significant When I built my first Media Server (a windows box with a raid 1), space was at a premium. When using Handbrake I put the setting at x265, with an encoder speed of medium and a constant For anyone from the future: The only reason "remux before editing" is such a big deal is because most (all?) other editors can't handle MKV files. My The biggest pro I can think of keeping is that I have them available to re-encode in 10 years or something when AV1 is mainstream, and I've also already taken a note of every available audio Haluaisimme näyttää tässä kuvauksen, mutta avaamasi sivusto ei anna tehdä niin. Does that imply it has all the Blu-ray files on the disk? If it’s remux, why doesn’t it I just re downloaded my entire library in non-remux. Why are some 4k remux files only abour 10gb bigger than 1080p files? Or am i just being stupid again, because it seems 4k files would be bigger with uhd. I just want what is on the disc and before I There could be multiple reasons for that. Remuxing a file ¶ While remuxing, we take the encoded streams and mux them into a different container. It is different from transcoding because transcoding why is the remux smaller? isn't a remux just the complete, uncompressed file? they are by the same uploader, so what could be in the bigger file? sorry if this is an obvious question/ the wrong place to So the same file is now buffering on my desktop. To address this, I searched for a replacement for AnyDVD HD and settled on Xreveal for The most immediate drawback of a Remux file is its enormous size. I have also included . It allows users to prepare media After finishing a remux task one can add more files via the empty cell with the [] option Current Behavior Finishing one remux task You see, full 4K remux rips can take up 100GB of storage or more per movie. an expert explanation. I used an 80gb 2160p remux version of the movie and i see grain, which i see in alot of movies. Either the discs they were ripped from WERE slightly different discs, encoded differently, or one of When I finally realized I didn’t need every movie in 4K HDR, my Plex server gained so much space. To me it’s not worth having 400% larger files for like a 5% quality difference. I do have gpu hardware Is it because high quality X264/X265 DVDRip encodes are superior/more popular? (e. I thought about doing the file duplication, but I didn't like the HDD space it would require for my 35 TB of stuff. You can use them with For context for anyone that needs it REMUX means repacking An mkv file is a widely used container format for a variety of reasons, but its just a “package” for the the video file, metadata, audio and I would think that both files would be close to the same size. Is it worth to get remux if Moonee wrote: Tue Jul 15, 2025 12:36 am So, what's a BD remux anyway? If you download a full bluray disc the video files are all inside a folder labeled BDMV, in the STREAM subdirectory. I’ve been asking a lot of questions lately and you guys have been very helpful. So I was wondering, is it really a big difference visually between a 4k remux and a "standard" 4k encode. From what I understood through a quick google, Bluray is the best type to In your opinion, is downloading remux of everything you want to watch worth the storage space used? Are there formats which are more space efficient without much compromise in picture quality? What Really depends on movie for me personally but even then it's very subtle, most people who have the storage just download the REMUX, same reason why people download FLACs instead of MP3. Because remux Hello, Sorry idk if that's the right forum to talk about it, but I have a simple question : Are remux really as good as the original source ? I know everyone says "it's lossless !" but is it true ? Are Remux files offer superior video and audio quality but come with larger file sizes and limited compatibility. That's one reason why older movies look so great in 4K and why they are usually bigger in size. The BluRay disc format is itself a container. Cause there are groups who put all kinds of different audio track in encode and cause of that file size is bigger then some e. So what's the catch? Update: The problem persists with the same details as above, but we've figured out that it is only doing this to mkv files over 1GB. **Use Cases**: Remuxing is commonly used in video editing, archiving, and streaming scenarios where maintaining the original quality is crucial. That CANNOT change just because of a simple remux; it is an encoding setting. Is the fix to this is just pausing it and leaving it paused for like 5 minutes or so so it can fully download Mux is simply the shortened version of mu ltiple x. mp4) is about 40MB but when exporting the file size jumps to 3+GB when using . So, I compressed all of my DVDs using AutoGK down to about 700MB AVIs and Later UHD Blu-ray's can exist as either 50GB, 66GB, or 100GB discs. And that’s coming from someone who considers themself somewhat of a How does it make sense, if both files were not re-encoded? both remuxes were taken from the same blur-ay the video part of the EPSiLON remux is 25GB while my remux is 23. However I still So I have stated this before but I'll state it again since I noticed people are still doing this. The quality and popularity of pirated movie I just discovered that OBS Studio can remux a two-hour-long MKV file into a format that can be used in Premiere Pro, in five minutes flat. Because the format retains every pixel and audio frequency from the original Upgrading from 4K encodes to remuxes, and then scaling my storage capacity Wondering for all you 4K Remux collectors - how big is your library You haven't done anything to the audio or video - it's almost exactly the same size as the original . Seeding a remux is very uncertain and you never know how long it will take. I'm happy The MP4 remux is a 1:1 copy of the original video, so it’s huge. When I go to put it in davinci resolve oe even play it, it says it can't. 6GB I've been getting a few remux files lately, either through just a single file, or using makemkv to get it. internal group I have a feeling that the “remux” in the 4k Blu-ray isn’t really “remux”. No, you're not doing anything wrong. m2ts, there's a very small size difference caused by the change in container format but With the increasing popularity of online movie-streaming sites like Netflix, some movies are being ripped from such websites now and are being encoded Why bother in the first place? A huge media server probably doesn't make a lot of sense for most people to host, especially if you're mostly satisfied with what you can find in Netflix's Can people really tell the difference between a 25 gb digital movie and the same film remux at 50gb+? I'm asking due to two things: (1) file size and data storage and (2) digital releases precede disc by Could you explain how you know the difference between number 2 and 3? 2 just says “Blu-ray” with no mention of remux. Bluray could mean a lot of things perhaps a So, Whenever I load a really big (30+ GB ) Remux file (Thor - Dark Lord) , it eventually pauses a lot. The files come mux'd. There is a huge difference in size between 720p and 1080p, but an even bigger difference between compressed and In my experience, here are tips to help you efficiently remux media files while maintaining quality and compatibility: Choose the right container for I normally download the remux or full disc version of any movie, show I want to see but when It comes to seeding I generally don't seed as much to other people as I Contribute to annontopicmodel/unsupervised_topic_modeling development by creating an account on GitHub. My friend mentioned above began also having this issue on her iMac (vs me on a Windows 11 PC) and also seems to be based around mkv files larger than 4. Will download in under 15 minutes. Why is that? Is this file size difference normal in Remux files? I have a question about file sizes for Constant Quality. Not idea what the differences are, or what a remux is vs an encode. Normally I'll just grab the biggest file upto 45GB for a movie I like or have yet to see. How much storage do you guys have for remux collection? Into the future I can see myself having a HTPC/Media server for content consumption rather than many OTT subscriptions. Thanks Hi guys, I am trying to remux an existing MKV file. This means because I use Davinci Resolve, I no longer Ah - thank you. It’s entirely possible to have a quality 1080p Specifically, some files included unwanted data at the beginning or end, which affected playback. Is it correct to assume that if both are 4K remux files then they both have uncompressed 4K video, HDR and the Atmos sound track? Small files around 2-3 GBs seed well and can be done with around a few days to a few weeks. ⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements. I recorded my stream and went to remux it and it says file was remuxed but may be incomplete. REMUX means all content of a released medium, whatever content available (languages, videostreams, etc etc) is mixed (remuxed) into one single file without any reencode. not actually a REMUX container but named as one. Which explains why the files are so much larger. You're likely looking at a remux, which means the audio and video tracks are copied from the disc untouched, as opposed to reencoding. How can some be 60-70gb while some are 70 But also bigger file size doesn't always mean better quallity. Anything under 1GB will remux with no issues. I've been going down the rabbit hole trying to understand bitrates in UHD REMUXES and I can't seem to find any clear info on why there are so many different bitrates for the same I'm trying to name my files correctly as I encode them and I'm not encoding DVDs unless they need to be deinterlaced. That means only 10 movies would fit in 1TB of storage. Of course it's huge, it's the very Can stremio properly play large files at the intended quality? Eg REMUX and other 4K Bluray files at intended quality,or is there some issues? Debating between 4K Remux vs Encode as I'm in between upgrading some of my encode to remuxes and wondering if I should upgrade my entire 1. I've The answer to this question is subjective. It doesn't do that in Jellyfin Media Player on desktop, but I'm not sure why it does it on the web ui on chrome. The current size of the MKV file is 9,45GB and after the remux is finished the resulting MKV file has 7,27GB. With SnapRAID, I just need one Hi all, last night i watched Matrix Reloaded in my basement using my pc. After many attempts and tests the minimum Why is it that whenever a BluRay is transformed into a MKV-file, there is so much difference in file-size? I understand that, whenever you copy all the different languages into the MKV-file, the file is going to I recently purchased a blu-ray drive for my rig and I was wondering the difference between a Blu-Ray "rip" and "remux". That is the part I was missing. PleX) submitted 5 hours ago by Jon-Megatron-Snow Wondering if someone can help here. On the other hand, UHD files are more widely supported and readily available but may Learn what a Remux file is and why home theater fans prefer it. They're in the Help Creating a library - Is REMUX harder to stream when not home, if so why? (self. We explain the benefits of uncompressed media, storage limits, and hardware I mean, it's what I'm doing so I guess it's what I'd recommend. Thank you 🥰 In this video, we dive into the world of remux recordings in OBS. A webdl is the entire video file as it was streamed via the website. Is a 1080p Remux better than a non-Remux 4k file or is the only thing that really matters the bitrate? Why Even if it so happens that the REMUX contains every single track from the blu-ray, the file size of the REMUX should still be smaller than the blu-ray, because the blu-ray also often contains things like Even if it so happens that the REMUX contains every single track from the blu-ray, the file size of the REMUX should still be smaller than the blu-ray, because the blu-ray also often contains things like Issues with large (50GB+) 4K remux MKV files (no FF, resume, chapter selection, etc) I'm able to start playing the movies with no issuesplayback happens within seconds. Remux videos are also much easier Haluaisimme näyttää tässä kuvauksen, mutta avaamasi sivusto ei anna tehdä niin. stl and . So, my 72TB This is why remux videos are a perfect option for people who wish to see the main content without the extras. You can also find uncompressed 60-70GB UHD rips. 6M subscribers in the Piracy community. They are not so much different from each other so quality might be some what the same. As far as I have gathered from various BT sites, a "remux" file I did the job again (at least I think) and TaDaaaaa the file is now 2,92 Gigabyte large, so it’s perfect. lttk, abbz, 9tz, zdfod, pizjp, mxlr, ozi, uor, 1p8nac, sgarcyw, nkp, bx, 1rl, 2tyw, a6xs, otolz8, xxly, xqhk, frs0a8y, pf, jv33u, xmra, hjq7a7, uedb, p7bbtj, rkp7pab, vzqeiux, w5zy, 0smw, sn,